| Page 129 | Kisaco Research
 

Adele Calamo Specchia

Head of Ownership & Licensing
ASML

Adele Calamo Specchia

Head of Ownership & Licensing
ASML

Adele Calamo Specchia

Head of Ownership & Licensing
ASML
 

Wolfram Thomas

Senior Director- Patent Counsel
Qualcomm

Wolfram Thomas

Senior Director- Patent Counsel
Qualcomm

Wolfram Thomas

Senior Director- Patent Counsel
Qualcomm
Report: Women’s Wellness: How It’s Evolved and What’s Next?

Navigating intellectual property disputes requires strategic decisions on the most effective resolution paths. This session explores the full range of options available to tech companies—from mediation and arbitration to licensing, opposition, and litigation. Gain insight into when each tool is best suited, how to manage IP portfolios proactively, support innovation teams, and balance the operational and financial impact of disputes on your business.

• Explore the expanding role of mediation and arbitration as faster, cost-effective alternatives to traditional litigation in various IP disputes.

• Understand the potential impact of the new UPC Mediation and Arbitration Centre in Ljubljana, and how it may change dispute resolution for European patent holders and implementers.

• Understand how strategic licensing and portfolio management can help avoid costly conflicts and support innovation.

• Discuss when to escalate matters through opposition proceedings or litigation and how to prepare for large-scale enforcement campaigns globally.

Author:

Bas Van Buul

Director of IP
Inalfa Roof Systems

Bas Van Buul

Director of IP
Inalfa Roof Systems

Author:

Jako Eleveld

Head of IP Licensing
Philips

Jako Eleveld

Head of IP Licensing
Philips

Author:

Mitsuaki Masumura

Head of Licensing AP & EMEA
IBM

Mitsuaki Masumura

Head of Licensing AP & EMEA
IBM

Author:

Linnea Harnesk

Head of IP Legal
Autoliv

Linnea Harnesk

Head of IP Legal
Autoliv
 

Bas Van Buul

Director of IP
Inalfa Roof Systems

Bas Van Buul

Director of IP
Inalfa Roof Systems

Bas Van Buul

Director of IP
Inalfa Roof Systems
 

Yann Dietrichh

Group Head of IP
Atos

Yann Dietrichh

Group Head of IP
Atos

Yann Dietrichh

Group Head of IP
Atos

With injunctions becoming a decisive battleground in global SEP and FRAND disputes before the German courts and UPC, this session explores how courts across key jurisdictions are shaping access to—and constraints on—injunctive relief. From the Vodafone/HMD matter in Germany to expanding dockets in Brazil, India, and China, this session unpacks strategic use of injunctions by both SEP holders and implementers, while spotlighting where legal frameworks may shift next. Explore how national courts and the UPC are interpreting proportionality, the influence of the European Commission, and the contrasting positions across global IP enforcement venues.

  • Compare how courts in Germany, the UK, the UPC, and the US weigh proportionality, public interest, and enforcement policy when determining injunction relief in SEP cases
  • Explore how jurisdictions like Brazil and Colombia are shaping global negotiations through low-cost, fast-granting preliminary injunctions and limited review of FRAND defences
  • Discuss the possibilities of injunctive relief in the USA and a change from the eBay standard

Author:

Steven Baldwin

Partner
Kirkland & Ellis

Steven Baldwin

Partner
Kirkland & Ellis

Author:

Le Chen

Senior Director- IP Policy & Dispute Resolution
Xiaomi Technology

Le Chen

Senior Director- IP Policy & Dispute Resolution
Xiaomi Technology

Author:

Koenraad Wuyds

Chief IP Officer
KPN

Koenraad Wuyds

Chief IP Officer
KPN

Author:

Tatiana Alvez

Partner
RNA Law

Tatiana Alvez

Partner
RNA Law

Author:

Julia Zhu

Senior IP Director
OPPO

Julia Zhu

Senior IP Director
OPPO